Car comparison

Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270vsFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Abarth Pulse

1.3 T270

175 hp1332 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    175 hp
    130 kW
  • Highest torque
    270 Nm
    199 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,280 kg
    2,822 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAbarthPulse1.3 T270FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
175hp130kW
155hp116kW
Torque
270Nm199lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,280kg2,822lb
1,280kg2,822lb
Gross weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,765kg3,891lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
77.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
37.4s
Calculated
62.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
1,332cc81cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,115mm162in
4,207mm166in
Width
1,777mm70in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,575mm62in
1,536mm60in
Wheelbase
2,532mm100in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,484mm58in
-
Rear track
1,510mm59in
-
Ground clearance
188mm7in
166mm7in
Trunk volume
370L
456L
Max trunk volume-
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
47L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AbarthPulse1.3 T2705,750 rpm1,850 rpm6,000 rpm
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAbarthPulse1.3 T270FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.4 s
62.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
16.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
175 hp
130 kW
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW

Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 has 20 hp more than Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,280 kg
2,822 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T2708.0 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 1.0 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
175 hp
130 kW
8.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AbarthPulse1.3 T270
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,115 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,575 mm
62.0 in
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAbarthPulse1.3 T270FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
175 hp
130 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
Fuel consumption
-
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,115 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,575 mm
62.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in
Trunk score
370 L
13.1 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 86 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.3 T270
1.5T
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsChevroletSeeker1.5T
1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1.3 T270
Cooper S 2.0
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
1.3 T270
Turismo 54 kWh
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsAbarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
1.3 T270
40 TFSI
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TDI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
1.3 T270
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1.0 EcoBoost
GLA 200d
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d
1.3 T270
1.6 PureTech
VS
AbarthPulse1.3 T270vsPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
Abarth Pulse 1.3 T270 vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster