Cupra Terramar
Car comparison
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsAbarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 600e
Scorpionissima 54 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Abarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh
- Most powerful282 hp210 kW
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 282hp210kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 345Nm254lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 1,925kg4,244lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 50.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 32.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,187mm165in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,779mm70in |
| Height | 1,586mm62in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,559mm101in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,231L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 282 hp 210 kW |
Abarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh has 17 hp more than Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Abarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 5.9 s |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 5.9 s |
Although Abarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh has more power, Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 174 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 282 hp 210 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 282 hp 210 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Has 55 Nm more
- Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 180 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Abarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























