Mazda CX-60
Car comparison
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GvsAbarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 600e
Scorpionissima 54 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Most powerful284 hp212 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Largest trunk477 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Abarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 284hp212kW | 282hp210kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 345Nm254lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,949kg4,297lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 1,925kg4,244lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 50.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.7s Calculated | 32.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 784km487mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,283cc200cu in | - |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,187mm165in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,779mm70in |
| Height | 1,688mm66in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,559mm101in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 179mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 477L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,726L | 1,231L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 171g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.7 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 284 hp 212 kW |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 282 hp 210 kW |
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G has 2 hp more than Abarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 1,949 kg 4,297 lb |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 6.9 s |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 5.9 s |
Although Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G has more power, Abarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 174 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 284 hp 212 kW | 6.9 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | 282 hp 210 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | Abarth600eScorpionissima 54 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 284 hp 212 kW | 282 hp 210 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,949 kg 4,297 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 784 km 487 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 171 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 105 Nm more
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 117 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Abarth 600e Scorpionissima 54 kWh
- Is 324 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























