Volvo XC90 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T6 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC90 II
2.0 T6 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC90 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed269 km/h167 mph
- Most powerful465 hp347 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest2,146 kg4,731 lb
- Best power-to-weight217 hp/t162 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions192 g/km
- Best estimated range855 km532 mi
- Largest trunk314 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 465hp347kW+155 hp | 403hp301kW+93 hp | 366hp273kW+56 hp | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft+220 Nm | 540Nm398lb-ft+140 Nm | 488Nm360lb-ft+88 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,146kg4,731lb | 2,146kg4,731lb | 2,146kg4,731lb | 2,146kg4,731lb |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.2s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-12.8 s Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph-6.2 s Calculated | 79.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-1.9 s Calculated | 81.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s-1.5 s | 5.5s-1.0 s | 5.9s-0.6 s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s-13.2 s Calculated | 20.2s-10.1 s Calculated | 22.6s-7.6 s Calculated | 30.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s-1.3 s Calculated | 5.2s-0.9 s Calculated | 5.6s-0.6 s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.7s-1.0 s Calculated | 14.0s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 217hp/t162kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 855km532mi Calculated | 855km532mi Calculated | 855km532mi Calculated | 855km532mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,675mm66in | 1,675mm66in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 238mm9in | 238mm9in | 238mm9in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 314L | 314L | 314L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,886L | 1,886L | 1,886L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 71L | 71L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 192g/km | 192g/km | 192g/km | 192g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 403 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 366 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 310 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.2 s | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.5 s | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 20.2 s | 22.6 s | 30.2 s |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.9 s | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.5 s | 11.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.7 s | 14.0 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 110 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 465 hp 347 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 403 hp 301 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 366 hp 273 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 310 hp 231 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp has 155 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 310 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 310 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp: 155 hp (116 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 5.0 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 5.5 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 310 hp: 1.5 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 403 hp and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 366 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 855 km 532 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 855 km 532 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 855 km 532 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 855 km 532 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 465 hp 347 kW | 5.0 s | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 403 hp 301 kW | 5.5 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 366 hp 273 kW | 5.9 s | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6310 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 465 hp 347 kW | 403 hp 301 kW | 366 hp 273 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.5 s | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 855 km 532 mi | 855 km 532 mi | 855 km 532 mi | 855 km 532 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 192 g/km | 192 g/km | 192 g/km | 192 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 403 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 366 hp | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 310 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp
- Has 62 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 403 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























