BMW X7 (G07)
Car comparison
BMW X7 (G07) 40ivsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X7 (G07) 40i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range922 km573 mi
- Largest trunk326 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Lightest2,146 kg4,731 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions192 g/km
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX7 (G07)40i | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,146kg4,731lb |
| Gross weight | 3,155kg6,956lb | - |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 80.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.8s Calculated | 30.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 922km573mi Calculated | 855km532mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,998cc183cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 5,151mm203in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,805mm71in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 3,105mm122in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,684mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,705mm67in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 221mm9in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 326L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,120L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 205g/km | 192g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X7 (G07) 40i: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,500-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX7 (G07)40i | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.8 s | 30.2 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 340 hp 254 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
BMW X7 (G07) 40i has 30 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and BMW X7 (G07) 40i: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 6.1 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X7 (G07) 40i and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and BMW X7 (G07) 40i: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 922 km 573 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 855 km 532 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X7 (G07) 40i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX7 (G07)40i | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 922 km 573 mi | 855 km 532 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 205 g/km | 192 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X7 (G07) 40i | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X7 (G07) 40i
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Is 174 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























