Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D5 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 D5 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 364 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph
- Most powerful364 hp272 kW
- Highest torque768 Nm566 lb-ft
- Lightest2,051 kg4,522 lb
- Best power-to-weight178 hp/t132 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions158 g/km
- Best estimated range1,183 km735 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 364hp272kW+129 hp | 317hp237kW+82 hp | 282hp210kW+47 hp | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 768Nm566lb-ft+288 Nm | 672Nm496lb-ft+192 Nm | 600Nm443lb-ft+120 Nm | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,051kg4,522lb | 2,051kg4,522lb | 2,051kg4,522lb | 2,051kg4,522lb |
| Top speed | 260 km/h 162 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph-11.5 s Calculated | 76.6s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph-6.2 s Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph-2.5 s Calculated | 82.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s-1.7 s | 6.0s-1.2 s | 6.4s-0.8 s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.3s-18.4 s Calculated | 22.8s-14.9 s Calculated | 26.7s-11.0 s Calculated | 37.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s-1.6 s Calculated | 5.7s-1.1 s Calculated | 6.1s-0.7 s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s-1.6 s Calculated | 14.1s-1.1 s Calculated | 14.5s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 178hp/t132kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 374Nm/t251lb-ft/ton Calculated | 328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,183km735mi Calculated | 1,183km735mi Calculated | 1,183km735mi Calculated | 1,183km735mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 505L | 505L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 71L | 71L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | 158g/km | 158g/km | 158g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 364 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 317 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 1) 282 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 235 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | 6.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.0 s | 6.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.3 s | 22.8 s | 26.7 s | 37.7 s |
| Top speed | 260 km/h 162 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.2 s | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.9 s | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.1 s | 14.5 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 107 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 364 hp 272 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 317 hp 237 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 282 hp 210 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 364 hp has 129 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 235 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 235 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 364 hp: 129 hp (96 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 768 Nm 566 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 672 Nm 496 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 260 km/h 162 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 5.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 6.0 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 6.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 364 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 235 hp: 1.7 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 317 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 1) 282 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 178 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 1,183 km 735 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 1,183 km 735 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 1,183 km 735 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 1,183 km 735 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 364 hp 272 kW | 5.5 s | 260 km/h 162 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 317 hp 237 kW | 6.0 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 282 hp 210 kW | 6.4 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 364 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | 178 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 3)364 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 2)317 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 (Stage 1)282 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5235 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 364 hp 272 kW | 317 hp 237 kW | 282 hp 210 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 768 Nm 566 lb-ft | 672 Nm 496 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.0 s | 6.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 260 km/h 162 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,183 km 735 mi | 1,183 km 735 mi | 1,183 km 735 mi | 1,183 km 735 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | 158 g/km | 158 g/km | 158 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 178 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 364 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 317 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 1) 282 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 235 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 364 hp
- Has 47 hp more
- Has 96 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 317 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























