Volvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5vsVolvo V90 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range1,321 km821 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Lightest1,860 kg4,101 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 215hp160kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,919kg4,231lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Gross weight | 2,390kg5,269lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.1s Calculated | 41.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,321km821mi Calculated | 797km495mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,838mm190in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,604mm63in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,815mm111in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,614mm64in | 1,928mm76in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 575L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 160g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.1 s | 41.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 25 hp more than Volvo V90 2.0 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 T4 and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 8.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,321 km 821 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 797 km 495 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | VolvoV902.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 215 hp 160 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,321 km 821 mi | 797 km 495 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 160 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 | Volvo V90 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 524 km (325 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Is 59 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























