Subaru Levorg · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Subaru Levorg · Facelift 2019 1.6vsVolvo V90 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions160 g/km
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Subaru Levorg Facelift 2019 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,596 kg3,519 lb
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t79 kW/t9.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,596kg3,519lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 82.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.1s Calculated | 41.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 797km495mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,600cc98cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,690mm185in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,928mm76in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 522L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,446L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 160g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru Levorg Facelift 2019 1.6: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.1 s | 41.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 T4 has 20 hp more than Subaru Levorg Facelift 2019 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Subaru Levorg Facelift 2019 1.6 and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | 1,596 kg 3,519 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | 8.9 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 8.9 s |
Although Volvo V90 2.0 T4 has more power, Subaru Levorg Facelift 2019 1.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | 833 km 518 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 797 km 495 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V90 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruLevorgFacelift 20191.6 | VolvoV902.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,596 kg 3,519 lb | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 797 km 495 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 160 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 522 L 18.4 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru Levorg Facelift 2019 1.6 | Volvo V90 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru Levorg Facelift 2019 1.6
- Is 264 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 km (23 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























