Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 T4vsVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,094 km680 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,860 kg4,101 lb
- Lowest CO2 emissions160 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 T4 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,932kg4,259lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.6s Calculated | 58.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 797km495mi Calculated | 1,094km680mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,928mm76in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 160g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 T4 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.6 s | 58.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 25 hp more than Volvo V90 2.0 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 T4 and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,932 kg 4,259 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 8.9 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 797 km 495 mi |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,094 km 680 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 T4 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | 1,932 kg 4,259 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 797 km 495 mi | 1,094 km 680 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 160 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 T4 | Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Is 72 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 297 km (184 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























