Car comparison

Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6vsVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC70 II

3.0 T6

285 hp2953 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2008-2010
VS

Volvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013

2.4 D5

215 hp2400 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    285 hp
    213 kW
  • Lightest
    1,769 kg
    3,900 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    161 hp/t
    120 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    575 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5

  • Highest torque
    440 Nm
    325 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    169 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,094 km
    680 mi
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC70 II3.0 T6VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Power
285hp213kW
215hp160kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
1,769kg3,900lb
1,932kg4,259lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,400kg5,291lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
69.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
74.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
34.0s
Calculated
58.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
609km378mi
Calculated
1,094km680mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,953cc180cu in
2,400cc146cu in
Length
4,838mm190in
4,838mm190in
Width
1,861mm73in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,604mm63in
1,604mm63in
Wheelbase
2,815mm111in
2,815mm111in
Front track
1,614mm64in
1,614mm64in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance
210mm8in
-
Trunk volume
575L
575L
Max trunk volume
1,600L
1,600L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
269g/km
169g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T65,950 rpm1,500-4,800 rpm6,200 rpm
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D54,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC70 II3.0 T6VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.0 s
58.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
285 hp
213 kW
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW

Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 has 70 hp more than Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 70 hp (52 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
1,932 kg
4,259 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T67.6 s
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D58.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 5.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
609 km
378 mi
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
1,094 km
680 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
285 hp
213 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW
8.3 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,604 mm
63.1 in
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,604 mm
63.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
7.6 s
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC70 II3.0 T6VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Power
285 hp
213 kW
215 hp
160 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
1,932 kg
4,259 lb
Fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,604 mm
63.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,604 mm
63.1 in
Range score
609 km
378 mi
1,094 km
680 mi
CO2 score
269 g/km
169 g/km
Trunk score
575 L
20.3 cu ft
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC70 II 3.0 T6Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.13 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.39 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,019 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6

  • Has 70 hp more
  • Is 163 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Uses 5.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 485 km (301 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 100 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
Volvo XC70 II 2.4 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6
2.4 D5
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5vsVolvoV902.0 T4
3.0 T6
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6vsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
2.4 D5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5vsVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
3.0 T6
2.4i 20V T5
VS
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
2.4 D5
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5vsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
3.0 T6
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6vsVolvoV502.5 T5
2.4 D5
CLS 250 BlueTEC
VS
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5vsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)Facelift 2014CLS 250 BlueTEC
3.0 T6
R 2.5i V20
VS
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6vsVolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20
2.4 D5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5vsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
3.0 T6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6vsAUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)Facelift 20083.0 TFSI V6
3.0 T6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)Facelift 20083.0 TFSI V6
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 vs Volvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster