Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5TvsVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,094 km680 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,932kg4,259lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 58.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 693km431mi Calculated | 1,094km680mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,755mm108in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,551mm61in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,641L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 58.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 5 hp more than Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,932 kg 4,259 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 7.8 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 8.3 s |
Although Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has more power, Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 693 km 431 mi |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,094 km 680 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,932 kg 4,259 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 693 km 431 mi | 1,094 km 680 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T | Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Is 337 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 401 km (249 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























