Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5TvsVolvo V70 III 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V70 III
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,806kg3,982lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,410kg5,313lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 31.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 693km431mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,823mm190in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,907mm75in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,547mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,755mm108in | 2,816mm111in |
| Front track | 1,551mm61in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 151mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,641L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 195g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: Power / Torque
- Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,980 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 31.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 has 30 hp more than Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 1,806 kg 3,982 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 7.8 s |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 7.9 s |
Although Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 has more power, Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 693 km 431 mi |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,806 kg 3,982 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 693 km 431 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 195 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T | Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Is 211 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Has 30 hp more
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 140 km (87 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























