Volvo V50
Car comparison
Volvo V50 2.5 T5vsVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004
2.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range693 km431 mi
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 77.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.3s Calculated | 29.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | 693km431mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,514mm178in | 4,710mm185in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,755mm108in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,551mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,548mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 485L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,641L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 243g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.3 s | 29.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo V50 2.5 T5 has 10 hp more than Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Volvo V50 2.5 T5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 569 km 353 mi |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 693 km 431 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V50 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | 693 km 431 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 243 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 2.5 T5 | Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 124 km (77 mi) more estimated range
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























