Volvo V40 Cross Country
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions152 g/km
- Best estimated range1,224 km761 mi
- Largest trunk368 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,624 kg3,580 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 213hp159kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,624kg3,580lb | 2,078kg4,581lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 97.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.6s Calculated | 43.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 704km437mi Calculated | 1,224km761mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,676mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,679mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 368L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 189g/km | 152g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 6,000 rpm | 2,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.6 s | 43.2 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 has 12 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 7.8 s |
Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 has more power, Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 704 km 437 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 1,224 km 761 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.8 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 213 hp 159 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 704 km 437 mi | 1,224 km 761 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 189 g/km | 152 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Is 454 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 520 km (323 mi) more estimated range
- Has 33 L more trunk volume
- Emits 37 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























