Volvo V40 Cross Country
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5vsAUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A1 citycarver (GB)
35 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful213 hp159 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score75/100
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Lightest1,200 kg2,646 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range727 km452 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 213hp159kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,624kg3,580lb | 1,200kg2,646lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 86.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.8s Calculated | 40.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 704km437mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,046mm159in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,756mm69in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,566mm101in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,523mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,505mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 335L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 189g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 6,000 rpm | 2,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.8 s | 40.4 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 has 63 hp more than AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 63 hp (47 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 1,200 kg 2,646 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 7.2 s |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 and AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 704 km 437 mi |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 213 hp 159 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb | 1,200 kg 2,646 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 704 km 437 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 189 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 | AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Has 63 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Is 424 kg lighter
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 km (15 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 65 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























