Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4vsVolvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 Cross Country
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,503 kg3,314 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,476 km917 mi
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Most powerful213 hp159 kW
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 213hp159kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,503kg3,314lb | 1,624kg3,580lb |
| Gross weight | 2,005kg4,420lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 82.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,476km917mi Calculated | 704km437mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,439mm57in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,646mm104in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 144mm6in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 6,000 rpm | 2,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW |
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 has 23 hp more than Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 7.2 s |
Although Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 has more power, Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,476 km 917 mi |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 704 km 437 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 213 hp 159 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,476 km 917 mi | 704 km 437 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 121 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 772 km (480 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 80 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























