Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4vsVolvo V40 1.6 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40
1.6 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,476 km917 mi
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Volvo V40 1.6 T4
- Lightest1,297 kg2,859 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | VolvoV401.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,503kg3,314lb | 1,297kg2,859lb |
| Gross weight | 2,005kg4,420lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 90.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 38.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,476km917mi Calculated | 969km602mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,596cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,439mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,536mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 144mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 324L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | VolvoV401.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 38.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Volvo V40 1.6 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 1.6 T4 and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 1.6 T4: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 1.6 T4: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,476 km 917 mi |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 969 km 602 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV401.6 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV401.6 T4 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | VolvoV401.6 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,476 km 917 mi | 969 km 602 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 | Volvo V40 1.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 507 km (315 mi) more estimated range
- Has 11 L more trunk volume
- Emits 40 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo V40 1.6 T4
- Is 206 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























