Volvo V40
Car comparison
Volvo V40 1.6 T4vsRenault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III (PHASE II)
GT 2.0 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 1.6 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Lightest1,297 kg2,859 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Best estimated range969 km602 mi
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score90/100
Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV401.6 T4 | RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,297kg2,859lb | 1,326kg2,923lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 1,854kg4,087lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.6s Calculated | 45.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 969km602mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,596cc97cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,295mm169in |
| Width | 1,802mm71in | 1,808mm71in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,641mm104in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,536mm60in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 405L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,162L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV401.6 T4 | RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.6 s | 45.8 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 1,326 kg 2,923 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 8.5 s |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 8.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 1.6 T4 and Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 969 km 602 mi |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 1.6 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV401.6 T4 | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV401.6 T4 | RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,297 kg 2,859 lb | 1,326 kg 2,923 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 969 km 602 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 1.6 T4 | Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 1.6 T4
- Is 29 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 29 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 81 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























