Volvo V40
Car comparison
Volvo V40 2.0 D4vsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 T3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,398 kg3,082 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,154 km717 mi
- Largest trunk496 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV402.0 D4 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 152hp113kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,398kg3,082lb | 1,479kg3,261lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 86.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.6s Calculated | 52.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,154km717mi Calculated | 1,127km700mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,802mm71in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,536mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 496L | 324L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV402.0 D4 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.6 s | 52.5 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
Volvo V40 2.0 D4 has 25 hp more than Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,398 kg 3,082 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 1,479 kg 3,261 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 8.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,154 km 717 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 1,127 km 700 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.3 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV402.0 D4 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 152 hp 113 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,398 kg 3,082 lb | 1,479 kg 3,261 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,154 km 717 mi | 1,127 km 700 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 2.0 D4 | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 81 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 27 km (17 mi) more estimated range
- Has 172 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























