Abarth Punto (199)
Car comparison
Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAirvsVolvo V40 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,154 km717 mi
- Largest trunk496 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Lightest1,185 kg2,612 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,185kg2,612lb | 1,398kg3,082lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.3s Calculated | 44.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 738km458mi Calculated | 1,154km717mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,065mm160in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,721mm68in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,490mm59in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,510mm99in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,483mm58in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,536mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 275L | 496L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,030L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 5,750 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.3 s | 44.9 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir has 3 hp more than Volvo V40 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 2.0 D4 and Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,398 kg 3,082 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 7.5 s |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 2.0 D4 and Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 738 km 458 mi |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,154 km 717 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.5 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | VolvoV402.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb | 1,398 kg 3,082 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 738 km 458 mi | 1,154 km 717 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | Volvo V40 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 213 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 416 km (259 mi) more estimated range
- Has 221 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























