Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 220 CDIvsVolvo V40 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 220 CDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions120 g/km
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,398 kg3,082 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,154 km717 mi
- Largest trunk496 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,398kg3,082lb |
| Gross weight | 2,025kg4,464lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.0s Calculated | 44.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,087km675mi Calculated | 1,154km717mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,359mm172in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,786mm70in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,549mm61in | 1,536mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 488L | 496L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,547L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 120g/km | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 220 CDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | 3,400-4,000 rpm | 1,400-3,400 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.0 s | 44.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
Volvo V40 2.0 D4 has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 220 CDI.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 220 CDI and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,398 kg 3,082 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 8.3 s |
Although Volvo V40 2.0 D4 has more power, Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 220 CDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 220 CDI and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | 1,087 km 675 mi |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,154 km 717 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 220 CDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 220 CDI | VolvoV402.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,398 kg 3,082 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,087 km 675 mi | 1,154 km 717 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 120 g/km | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 488 L 17.2 cu ft | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 220 CDI | Volvo V40 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 220 CDI
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 107 kg lighter
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 8 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























