Abarth Punto (199)
Car comparison
Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAirvsAbarth 595 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 595
1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range738 km458 mi
- Largest trunk275 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score59/100
Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet
- Lightest1,045 kg2,304 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,185kg2,612lb | 1,045kg2,304lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,435kg3,164lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 68.1s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.3s Calculated | 44.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 738km458mi Calculated | 547km340mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 4,065mm160in | 3,657mm144in |
| Width | 1,721mm68in | 1,627mm64in |
| Height | 1,490mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,510mm99in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,483mm58in | 1,409mm55in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,402mm55in |
| Trunk volume | 275L | 185L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,030L | 610L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 35L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 5,750 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.3 s | 44.4 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 180 hp 134 kW |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW |
Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir has 20 hp more than Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet and Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 1,045 kg 2,304 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 7.5 s |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir and Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 738 km 458 mi |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 547 km 340 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.5 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.6 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb | 1,045 kg 2,304 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 738 km 458 mi | 547 km 340 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir | Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth Punto (199) SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 191 km (119 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























