Alfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2013 1.4 TPvsAbarth 595 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 595
1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk270 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score59/100
Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet
- Lightest1,045 kg2,304 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,170kg2,579lb | 1,045kg2,304lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,435kg3,164lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 67.6s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.2s Calculated | 44.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 547km340mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 4,063mm160in | 3,657mm144in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,627mm64in |
| Height | 1,446mm57in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,511mm99in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,483mm58in | 1,409mm55in |
| Rear track | 1,475mm58in | 1,402mm55in |
| Trunk volume | 270L | 185L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 610L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 35L |
| CO2 emissions | 124g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 5,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.2 s | 44.2 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW |
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP has 10 hp more than Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet and Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 1,170 kg 2,579 lb |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 1,045 kg 2,304 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 7.3 s |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP and Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP and Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 833 km 518 mi |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 547 km 340 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.3 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.6 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP | Abarth5951.4 T-Jet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,170 kg 2,579 lb | 1,045 kg 2,304 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 547 km 340 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 124 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP | Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2013 1.4 TP
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 286 km (178 mi) more estimated range
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























