Volvo V40
Car comparison
Volvo V40 2.0 D4vsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 T3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,379 kg3,040 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,395 km867 mi
- Largest trunk496 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV402.0 D4 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 152hp113kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,379kg3,040lb | 1,479kg3,261lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 86.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.6s Calculated | 52.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,395km867mi Calculated | 1,127km700mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,802mm71in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,536mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 496L | 324L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 114g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV402.0 D4 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.6 s | 52.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
Volvo V40 2.0 D4 has 25 hp more than Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 1,479 kg 3,261 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 8.6 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 8.3 s |
Although Volvo V40 2.0 D4 has more power, Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,395 km 867 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 1,127 km 700 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.3 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV402.0 D4 | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 152 hp 113 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb | 1,479 kg 3,261 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,395 km 867 mi | 1,127 km 700 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 114 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 2.0 D4 | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 268 km (167 mi) more estimated range
- Has 172 L more trunk volume
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























