Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 · Stage 3vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 · Stage 2vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 · Stage 1vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T5 (Stage 2)
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T5 (Stage 1)
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 367 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed269 km/h167 mph
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque543 Nm400 lb-ft
- Lightest1,589 kg3,503 lb
- Best power-to-weight231 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,144 km711 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW+122 hp | 318hp238kW+73 hp | 289hp216kW+44 hp | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm | 473Nm348lb-ft+123 Nm | 427Nm315lb-ft+77 Nm | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,589kg3,503lb | 1,589kg3,503lb | 1,589kg3,503lb | 1,589kg3,503lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.3s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-12.9 s Calculated | 51.2s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph-8.9 s Calculated | 53.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-6.3 s Calculated | 60.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s-1.4 s | 5.4s-1.0 s | 5.7s-0.6 s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s-7.1 s Calculated | 16.4s-4.9 s Calculated | 18.2s-3.1 s Calculated | 21.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s-1.3 s Calculated | 5.1s-0.9 s Calculated | 5.4s-0.6 s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.3s-1.0 s Calculated | 13.7s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 231hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,144km711mi Calculated | 1,144km711mi Calculated | 1,144km711mi Calculated | 1,144km711mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 136mm5in | 136mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 380L | 380L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L | 68L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 367 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 318 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 289 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 245 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.1 s | 5.4 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 16.4 s | 18.2 s | 21.3 s |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.9 s | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.3 s | 11.6 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s | 13.7 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 367 hp 274 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 318 hp 238 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 289 hp 216 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | 245 hp 183 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 367 hp has 122 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 245 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 245 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 367 hp: 122 hp (91 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 4.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 5.4 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 5.7 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 367 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 245 hp: 1.4 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 318 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 289 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 1,144 km 711 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 1,144 km 711 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 1,144 km 711 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | 1,144 km 711 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.9 s | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 318 hp 238 kW | 5.4 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 289 hp 216 kW | 5.7 s | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 367 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 3)367 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 2)318 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 (Stage 1)289 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5245 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 318 hp 238 kW | 289 hp 216 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,144 km 711 mi | 1,144 km 711 mi | 1,144 km 711 mi | 1,144 km 711 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 367 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 318 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 289 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 245 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 367 hp
- Has 49 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 318 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























