Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T5vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 T5

245 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2013-2018
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,589 kg
    3,503 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,144 km
    711 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
245hp183kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,589kg3,503lb
1,685kg3,715lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
60.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
59.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
21.3s
Calculated
23.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,144km711mi
Calculated
1,072km666mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
540L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
74L
CO2 emissions-
159g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T55,500 rpm1,500-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.3 s
23.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
168 km/h
104 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
245 hp
183 kW
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has 5 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
1,589 kg
3,503 lb
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,685 kg
3,715 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T56.3 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.06.6 s

Although Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
1,144 km
711 mi
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,072 km
666 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
245 hp
183 kW
6.3 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.6 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
6.3 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,589 kg
3,503 lb
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
1,144 km
711 mi
1,072 km
666 mi
CO2 score
-
159 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
148 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5

  • Is 96 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 72 km (44 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Has 160 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5vsVolvoS60 II2.0 T5
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5vsVolvoS902.0 T5
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 T5
C 300
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 BiTDI
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 vs Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster