Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,144 km711 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,589kg3,503lb |
| Gross weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 60.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 21.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 957km594mi Calculated | 1,144km711mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 21.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.2 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 957 km 594 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 1,144 km 711 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 957 km 594 mi | 1,144 km 711 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 9 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 160 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 188 km (117 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























