Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,144 km711 mi
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score91/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,589kg3,503lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 60.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 21.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 840km522mi Calculated | 1,144km711mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 21.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 has 5 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 840 km 522 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 1,144 km 711 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 840 km 522 mi | 1,144 km 711 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Is 59 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 304 km (189 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























