Car comparison

Volvo S90 2.0 D4vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T3

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S90

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2018-2020
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 T3

152 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S90 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    102 hp/t
    76 kW/t
    9.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    123 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS902.0 D4VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Power
190hp142kW
152hp113kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,866kg4,114lb
1,534kg3,382lb
Gross weight-
2,060kg4,542lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
81.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
76.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
29.6s
Calculated
37.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,170km727mi
Calculated
1,205km749mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,963mm195in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,879mm74in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,941mm116in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,628mm64in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,629mm64in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
136mm5in
Trunk volume
500L
380L
Max trunk volume-
1,749L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
68L
CO2 emissions
123g/km
131g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S90 2.0 D4Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3PowerTorque
  • Volvo S90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS902.0 D44,250 rpm-5,000 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T35,000 rpm1,300-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS902.0 D4VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.6 s
37.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.9 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
152 hp
113 kW

Volvo S90 2.0 D4 has 38 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 and Volvo S90 2.0 D4: 38 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
1,866 kg
4,114 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
1,534 kg
3,382 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D48.2 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T38.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D4 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D4 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
1,170 km
727 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
1,205 km
749 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS902.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.2 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
152 hp
113 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS902.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Power
152 hp
113 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS902.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Power
152 hp
113 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Volvo S90 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS902.0 D4
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
8.2 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS902.0 D4
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS902.0 D4VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3
Power
190 hp
142 kW
152 hp
113 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,866 kg
4,114 lb
1,534 kg
3,382 lb
Fuel consumption
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,170 km
727 mi
1,205 km
749 mi
CO2 score
123 g/km
131 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S90 2.0 D4Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3
Consumption4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.23 LC100 km9.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.24 LC100 mi15.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used705 L186 US gal155 UK gal840 L222 US gal185 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,234 LC/year1,470 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S90 2.0 D4

  • Has 38 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 120 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 8 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3

  • Is 332 kg lighter
  • Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T3
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
2.0 T3
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0 T3
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0 D4
20d
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsJaguarXF (X260)20d
2.0 T3
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3vsVolvoS902.0 T4
2.0 D4
C 200
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
2.0 T3
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
D180
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180
2.0 T3
1.4 TSI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3vsVolkswagenLavida IIFacelift 20151.4 TSI
2.0 D4
320d
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d
2.0 T3
2.0 TDCi
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3vsFordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi
Volvo S90 2.0 D4 vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 - car comparison - FastVsFaster