Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 T4vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Lightest1,534 kg3,382 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions131 g/km
- Best estimated range1,205 km749 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight104 hp/t77 kW/t9.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 T4 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 152hp113kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,831kg4,037lb | 1,534kg3,382lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 37.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 1,205km749mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,749L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | 131g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 T4 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 37.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has 38 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 1,534 kg 3,382 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 8.7 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 8.6 s |
Although Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 821 km 510 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 1,205 km 749 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S90 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 T4 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 152 hp 113 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | 1,534 kg 3,382 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 1,205 km 749 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | 131 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 T4 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T3
- Is 297 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 384 km (239 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























