Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,671 kg3,684 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,671kg3,684lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 87.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 71.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,250km777mi Calculated | 1,071km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,628mm182in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 25 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 8.8 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 1,250 km 777 mi |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,071 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,250 km 777 mi | 1,071 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 | Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4
- Is 14 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 179 km (111 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























