Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 D4vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
1.5 T3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight102 hp/t76 kW/t9.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,170 km727 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
- Lightest1,533 kg3,380 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 D4 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 152hp113kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,866kg4,114lb | 1,533kg3,380lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 70.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.6s Calculated | 45.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,170km727mi Calculated | 1,164km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | - | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 D4 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.6 s | 45.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 D4 has 38 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 and Volvo S90 2.0 D4: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 1,866 kg 4,114 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 1,533 kg 3,380 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 8.2 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D4 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D4 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 1,170 km 727 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 1,164 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S90 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 D4 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 152 hp 113 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,866 kg 4,114 lb | 1,533 kg 3,380 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,170 km 727 mi | 1,164 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 D4 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 6 km (4 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
- Is 333 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























