Volvo S60 II
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
1.5 T3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
- Lightest1,533 kg3,380 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 215hp160kW | 152hp113kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,533kg3,380lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 70.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.1s Calculated | 45.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 1,164km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,628mm182in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.1 s | 45.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 63 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 63 hp (47 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 1,533 kg 3,380 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 7.6 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 1,164 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 215 hp 160 kW | 152 hp 113 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,533 kg 3,380 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 1,164 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Has 63 hp more
- Has 190 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
- Is 152 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























