Volvo S40 II
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk404 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,144 km711 mi
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,486kg3,276lb | 1,667kg3,675lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | 1,144km711mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,468mm176in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 241g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 has 5 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,667 kg 3,675 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 7.5 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 574 km 357 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,144 km 711 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | 1,667 kg 3,675 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | 1,144 km 711 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 241 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 181 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 24 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 570 km (354 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























