Volvo S40 II
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5vsVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003
2.5T 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score80/100
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Lowest city consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,486kg3,276lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 27.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,468mm176in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,562mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | 1,106L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 241g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 27.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 has 10 hp more than Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 7.5 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 241 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 44 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























