Volvo S40 II
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5vsJaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-type (X400)
3.0 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.1 L/100 km15.6 mpg US18.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score80/100
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Best estimated range581 km361 mi
- Largest trunk452 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 279Nm206lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,486kg3,276lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 65.2s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | 581km361mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,968cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,468mm176in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | 452L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | 241g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW |
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V has 11 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 and Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 7.5 s |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 7.5 s |
Although Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V has more power, Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 574 km 357 mi |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 581 km 361 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.5 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | 581 km 361 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 241 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 452 L 16.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 | Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Has 41 Nm more
- Is 84 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 7 km (4 mi) more estimated range
- Has 48 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























