Jaguar X-type (X400)
Car comparison
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24VvsVolvo S40 II 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S40 II
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Lowest city consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range592 km368 mi
- Largest trunk452 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 279Nm206lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,486kg3,276lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 67.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.2s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 592km368mi Calculated | 574km357mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,968cc181cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,468mm176in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,710mm107in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,537mm61in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 404L |
| Max trunk volume | 452L | 883L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 241g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.2 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V has 11 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 and Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 7.0 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V and Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 592 km 368 mi |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 574 km 357 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.0 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 592 km 368 mi | 574 km 357 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 241 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 452 L 16.0 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V | Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Has 48 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Has 41 Nm more
- Is 84 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























