Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 250vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,144 km711 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,667kg3,675lb |
| Gross weight | 2,245kg4,949lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.3s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 967km601mi Calculated | 1,144km711mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,474mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,598mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,614mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,667 kg 3,675 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 7.4 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 7.6 s |
Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 967 km 601 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,144 km 711 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.4 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 1,667 kg 3,675 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 967 km 601 mi | 1,144 km 711 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250
- Is 62 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 160 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 177 km (110 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























