Volkswagen Phideon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIvsVolkswagen Jetta VI · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta VI · Facelift 2014
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,310 km814 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,940kg4,277lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 75.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.5s Calculated | 38.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 1,310km814mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 5,074mm200in | 4,659mm183in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,778mm70in |
| Height | 1,489mm59in | 1,482mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,009mm118in | 2,651mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,538mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 4,500-6,250 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.5 s | 38.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 224 hp 167 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI has 74 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 74 hp (55 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI and Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,310 km 814 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 224 hp 167 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | VolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 1,310 km 814 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI | Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
- Has 74 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Jetta VI Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Is 390 kg lighter
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 238 km (148 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























