Car comparison

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIvsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Phideon

380TSI

224 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2016-present
VS

Jaguar XE (X760)

2.0

200 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    224 hp
    167 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,071 km
    666 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Lightest
    1,530 kg
    3,373 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    131 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenPhideon380TSIJaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
224hp167kW
200hp149kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,815kg4,001lb
1,530kg3,373lb
Gross weight-
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
84.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
71.3s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
27.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,071km666mi
Calculated
840km522mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
5,074mm200in
4,672mm184in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,850mm73in
Height
1,489mm59in
1,416mm56in
Wheelbase
3,009mm118in
2,835mm112in
Trunk volume-
455L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
63L
CO2 emissions-
179g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIJaguar XE (X760) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI4,500-6,250 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm
JaguarXE (X760)2.05,500 rpm1,750-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenPhideon380TSIJaguarXE (X760)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
27.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
224 hp
167 kW
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
200 hp
149 kW

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI has 24 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 24 hp (18 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
1,815 kg
4,001 lb
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
1,530 kg
3,373 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI8.1 s
JaguarXE (X760)2.07.7 s

Although Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
1,071 km
666 mi
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
840 km
522 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
224 hp
167 kW
8.1 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
200 hp
149 kW
7.7 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,074 mm
199.8 in
Height
1,489 mm
58.6 in
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.1 s
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenPhideon380TSIJaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
224 hp
167 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,815 kg
4,001 lb
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,074 mm
199.8 in
Height
1,489 mm
58.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
Range score
1,071 km
666 mi
840 km
522 mi
CO2 score
-
179 g/km
Trunk score
-
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Phideon 380TSIJaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI

  • Has 24 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 231 km (144 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Is 285 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

380TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0
D180
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180
380TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
2.0
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
380TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
380TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
380TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI
2.0
2.0d
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
380TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenLavida IIFacelift 20151.4 TSI
2.0
1.6 Energy TCe
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsRenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI vs Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster