Volkswagen Scirocco III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,298 kg2,862 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk312 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range775 km481 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,298kg2,862lb | 1,563kg3,446lb |
| Gross weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 101.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.0s Calculated | 33.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 743km462mi Calculated | 775km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,256mm168in | 4,423mm174in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,444mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 312L | 205L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,006L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 165g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.0 s | 33.5 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 1,298 kg 2,862 lb |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 743 km 462 mi |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 775 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,298 kg 2,862 lb | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 743 km 462 mi | 775 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 165 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 107 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 km (20 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























