BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82)
Car comparison
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125ivsVolkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Scirocco III
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,298 kg2,862 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range743 km462 mi
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score51/100
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,298kg2,862lb |
| Gross weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 84.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.2s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 671km417mi Calculated | 743km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,256mm168in |
| Width | 1,748mm69in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,423mm56in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,474mm58in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,507mm59in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 147mm6in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 312L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,006L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 190g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 6,100 rpm | 2,500-4,250 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.2 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 218 hp 163 kW |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i has 8 hp more than Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 1,298 kg 2,862 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 6.4 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i and Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 671 km 417 mi |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 743 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,298 kg 2,862 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 671 km 417 mi | 743 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 190 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i | Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 58 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 107 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























