Car comparison

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSIvsVolvo C30 2.4 i 20V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Eos

2.0 16V TFSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2006-2009
VS

Volvo C30

2.4 i 20V

170 hp2435 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    232 km/h
    144 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    47/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V

  • Lightest
    1,429 kg
    3,150 lb
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    738 km
    459 mi
  • Largest trunk
    233 L
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIVolvoC302.4 i 20V
Power
200hp149kW
170hp127kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
230Nm170lb-ft
Curb weight
1,539kg3,393lb
1,429kg3,150lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
1,840kg4,057lb
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
98.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
94.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
35.6s
Calculated
42.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
671km417mi
Calculated
738km459mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,435cc149cu in
Length
4,407mm174in
4,252mm167in
Width
1,791mm71in
1,782mm70in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,447mm57in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,640mm104in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,548mm61in
Rear track
1,553mm61in
1,544mm61in
Trunk volume
205L
233L
Max trunk volume
380L
-
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
62L
CO2 emissions-
200g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSIVolvo C30 2.4 i 20VPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm
VolvoC302.4 i 20V6,000 rpm4,400 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIVolvoC302.4 i 20V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.6 s
42.9 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
200 hp
149 kW
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
170 hp
127 kW

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI has 30 hp more than Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
230 Nm
170 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
1,429 kg
3,150 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
232 km/h
144 mph
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI7.8 s
VolvoC302.4 i 20V8.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI and Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
671 km
417 mi
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
738 km
459 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
232 km/h
144 mph
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
170 hp
127 kW
8.1 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
233 L
8.2 cu ft
Length
4,252 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIVolvoC302.4 i 20V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
230 Nm
170 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.1 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
233 L
8.2 cu ft
Length
4,252 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in
Range score
671 km
417 mi
738 km
459 mi
CO2 score
-
200 g/km
Trunk score
205 L
7.2 cu ft
233 L
8.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSIVolvo C30 2.4 i 20V
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V

  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 28 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
2.4 i 20V
2.5 T5 20V
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsVolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
2.4 i 20V
Cupra 1.4 TSI
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsSeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI
2.0 16V TFSI
1.8 TBi
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsAlfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi
2.4 i 20V
2.5 20V T
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsVolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI
2.4 i 20V
1.3 Wankel
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
2.4 i 20V
1.8 TFSI
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
2.4 i 20V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsRenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI vs Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V - car comparison - FastVsFaster