AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) · Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSIvsVolvo C30 2.4 i 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C30
2.4 i 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,086 km675 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | VolvoC302.4 i 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,429kg3,150lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.1s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 94.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.6s Calculated | 42.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,086km675mi Calculated | 738km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 2,435cc149cu in |
| Length | 4,626mm182in | 4,252mm167in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,782mm70in |
| Height | 1,372mm54in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,751mm108in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,548mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,544mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 233L |
| Max trunk volume | 829L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | 200g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 3,800-6,200 rpm | 1,400-3,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | VolvoC302.4 i 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.6 s | 42.9 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 170 hp 127 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 8.2 s |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V and AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI and Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 1,086 km 675 mi |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 738 km 459 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.2 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.4 i 20V | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI | VolvoC302.4 i 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,086 km 675 mi | 738 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | 200 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI | Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) Facelift 2011 1.8 TFSI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 348 km (216 mi) more estimated range
- Has 222 L more trunk volume
- Emits 66 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V
- Is 26 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























