Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Eos
2.0 16V TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range775 km481 mi
- Largest trunk205 L
- Best overall score48/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
- Lightest1,539 kg3,393 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,563kg3,446lb | 1,539kg3,393lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 98.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.5s Calculated | 35.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 775km481mi Calculated | 671km417mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,423mm174in | 4,407mm174in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,444mm57in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,553mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 205L | 205L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 380L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.5 s | 35.6 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 7.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 775 km 481 mi |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 671 km 417 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 775 km 481 mi | 671 km 417 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 104 km (65 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
- Is 24 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























