Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,576 kg3,474 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,404 km873 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,576kg3,474lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,290kg5,049lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 133.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 131.7s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.6s Calculated | 44.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,404km873mi Calculated | 1,294km804mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,861mm191in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 148mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 625L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,760L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.6 s | 44.8 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,404 km 873 mi |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 1,294 km 804 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,404 km 873 mi | 1,294 km 804 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI | Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Is 9 kg lighter
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 110 km (68 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























