Skoda Superb III
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 350 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque565 Nm417 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score60/100
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 131.7s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.8s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,294km804mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | - |
| Length | 4,861mm191in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 148mm6in | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.8 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 87 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 102 hp more than Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 102 hp (76 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh and Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,294 km 804 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
- Is 730 kg lighter
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Has 102 hp more
- Has 165 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























