Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 350 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,656 kg3,651 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score88/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque565 Nm417 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,656kg3,651lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,270kg5,004lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 93.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.1s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 930km578mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,866mm192in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,557L | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.1 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 12 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,656 kg 3,651 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 6.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has more power, Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,656 kg 3,651 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 930 km 578 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 659 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 165 Nm more
- Has 47 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























