Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

280 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2020-2023
VS

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297)

EQS 350 100 kWh

292 hpElectricRWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2021-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,656 kg
    3,651 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    169 hp/t
    126 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
280hp209kW
292hp218kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
565Nm417lb-ft
Curb weight
1,656kg3,651lb
2,315kg5,104lb
Gross weight
2,270kg5,004lb
2,910kg6,415lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
93.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.5s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
22.1s
Calculated
39.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.2s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.7s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
930km578mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
-
Length
4,866mm192in
5,216mm205in
Width
1,871mm74in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,512mm60in
Wheelbase
2,835mm112in
3,210mm126in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,667mm66in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,682mm66in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
134mm5in
Trunk volume
563L
610L
Max trunk volume
1,557L
1,770L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.2 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.5 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.1 s
39.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.7 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
102 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 12 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
565 Nm
417 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,656 kg
3,651 lb
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2,315 kg
5,104 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has more power, Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 1.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW
6.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
280 hp
209 kW
292 hp
218 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
565 Nm
417 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.5 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,656 kg
3,651 lb
2,315 kg
5,104 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in
Range score
930 km
578 mi
-
Trunk score
563 L
19.9 cu ft
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Is 659 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster