Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best estimated range1,404 km873 mi
- Largest trunk563 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Lightest1,541 kg3,397 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,576kg3,474lb | 1,541kg3,397lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 133.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 125.8s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.6s Calculated | 38.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,404km873mi Calculated | 1,119km695mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 2,836mm112in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,583mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 563L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,557L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.6 s | 38.6 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,404 km 873 mi |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,119 km 695 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,404 km 873 mi | 1,119 km 695 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 286 km (177 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























