Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2021-2023
VS

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297)

EQS 350 100 kWh

292 hpElectricRWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2021-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    292 hp
    218 kW
  • Highest torque
    565 Nm
    417 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
190hp142kW
292hp218kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
565Nm417lb-ft
Curb weight
1,541kg3,397lb
2,315kg5,104lb
Gross weight
2,160kg4,762lb
2,910kg6,415lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
125.8s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
38.6s
Calculated
39.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,119km695mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
-
Length
4,866mm192in
5,216mm205in
Width
1,871mm74in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,512mm60in
Wheelbase
2,836mm112in
3,210mm126in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,667mm66in
Rear track
1,583mm62in
1,682mm66in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
134mm5in
Trunk volume
563L
610L
Max trunk volume
1,557L
1,770L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
-
CO2 emissions
135g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.6 s
39.4 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 102 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 102 hp (76 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
565 Nm
417 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,541 kg
3,397 lb
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2,315 kg
5,104 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
237 km/h
147 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
237 km/h
147 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW
6.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
190 hp
142 kW
292 hp
218 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
565 Nm
417 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,541 kg
3,397 lb
2,315 kg
5,104 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in
Range score
1,119 km
695 mi
-
CO2 score
135 g/km
-
Trunk score
563 L
19.9 cu ft
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

  • Has 102 hp more
  • Has 245 Nm more
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 47 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster